Nvidia's AI demand keeps compounding as debt-fueled chip orders and bubble warnings collide
A wave of new, concrete chip orders and financing Amazon will deploy two million more Nvidia GPUs in 2027-2028 and is moving $8 billion of Grace Blackwell chips into an outside-financed vehicle; AM Intelligence placed binding orders for 20,000 more Rubin GPUs; SpaceX is raising $40 billion specifically to buy Nvidia chips. These are real orders, not forecasts, so they support future revenue and the stock.
This is the period's biggest new force: named buyers committing to buy Nvidia chips at scale.
Nvidia's own results and new markets beyond data centers Revenue more than doubled, Data Center hit $89 billion, and guidance for next quarter is $108 billion, with the Vera Rubin platform in full production. Nvidia also pushed into new areas: its RTX Spark chip is in Microsoft's Surface Laptop Ultra, it invested in AI labs Nous Research and Reflection AI, and it pledged $1 billion to a federal science initiative.
It shows the growth engine is still running and Nvidia is opening new markets, which is what long-term investors care about.
AI debt boom and bubble warnings raise the cost of the buildout The AI buildout is increasingly funded by borrowing: SpaceX's $40 billion, Broadcom's possible $600 billion, and Volta's $5 billion loan at an 11% yield. Credit-default insurance on Nvidia has risen above 7%, and Ray Dalio, Michael Burry (who is short Nvidia) and others warn the bubble may burst. Higher borrowing costs and doubt can pressure the stock.
This is the real counterweight: the same orders are financed with debt, and investors are starting to price that risk.
OpenAI revenue confusion and Groq legal risk A report that OpenAI's annualized revenue is about $50 billion, not the $68 billion circulated, knocked AI stocks; Nvidia fell 2.94% to $230.48. Separately, two former Groq engineers sued in Delaware over the structure of Nvidia's $20 billion Groq deal, which regulators are also examining. Both add uncertainty about demand assumptions and legal exposure.
It explains the period's sharp down day and a live legal/regulatory overhang on a key deal.
